We may be in recession – but that’s no excuse to dress scruffily.
There has been much comment in my office this week about the antics of Nick Leslau and Mike Brown, photographed in last week’s edition of Property Week to promote the launch of their £200m stock market listed property fund, Max Property.
So have people been debating whether they have called the market right, or even where they got the name from? No. The older guys in my office have been getting extremely agitated about the fact that neither man is wearing a tie.
Millionaire tycoon or office boy, the property industry is hardly noted for its sartorial originality – in fact, the standard uniform of the pin-striped suit and Windsor knot has hardly changed over the years. But after a quick poll of my female property compatriots (well, you could hardly expect men to notice fashion trends!) it seems that Leslau’s no-tie antics may be pointing the way forwards.
At least his (unbuttoned) shirt is white, and not covered in some garish pastel stripe or pattern, which the male fashion offender tends to accent with an equally nauseous tie. And I suspect that his shoes – if we could see them – would not have the ridiculous winkle-picking pointy toe favoured by some young male surveyors. Peering closely at the photo through my half-moon spectacles, nor can I detect any traces of the biggest fashion crime to befall property men in dark suits – dandruff on the shoulders.
I ate my lunch in Berkeley Square on a sunny day recently with a friend, and noticed a worrying new male “dress down” trend, namely mustard cords teamed with a white shirt and bright red jumper or (even worse) tank top. Commonly accessorised with a Black n’ Red book tucked under the arm. Please stop it at once! You look like Rupert the Bear in human form.
Now, it would be unfair of me not to mention a few distasteful female dress-down errors, although I have a feeling that most of these have probably been warmly received by property blokes. Firstly, the trend for skirts with a big slit up the back. Why? As you walk through the office, we can practically see what you had for breakfast. Then there’s ultra short “City shorts” with tights – unless you are a stick insect, you will look fat, and even if you are very skinny, you will just look like a tart. And just because we are in a slump doesn’t mean that trousers should be abandoned in favour of (gulp) leggings. I don’t care if they are a designer label, there are certain parts of the female anatomy that should not be encapsulated in skin-tight lycra for the world to see.
And if there are any crimes against fashion going on in your office, I want to hear about it.



5 Responses to “We may be in recession – but that’s no excuse to dress scruffily.”
By Gesmond on May 20, 2009 | Reply
In total agreement. Although in my view always more appropriate to have a tie on when meeting clients. Big fan of the bright shirt/tie combination dependant on the day.
By Mr G on May 22, 2009 | Reply
To be fair Surveyors are no known for their sartorial elegance are they ?
Look out at the Surveyor 7’s this weekend for example, there will be the pinky ring brigade in their red cords, check shirts and even the odd bota if the sun is out, there will be the younger bucks in designer sun-glasses, combat shorts and Ted Baker t-shirts and by the end of the day the tent surfing half time streakers.
The beer tents will be full of people looking to get as much free booze and food out of their penny pinching employers as possible and who can blame them.
By Tony Joyce on May 22, 2009 | Reply
I found this article hilareous to read. Well done the author. On a serious note however,let’s face it, for male Chartered Surveyors (I would not dane to comment on the female attire) there is nothing easier than donning ‘the uniform’. Dark suit, Black shoes and a suitable shirt and tie. By dressing in ‘the uniform’ you will not offend clients, you will look smart and as a result will probably have a tidy desk and a tidy mind. Dressing down especially on Fridays has become fashionable but probably not profitable. A good friend of mine who is CEO of a well known City Bank, undertook an experiment where ‘Dress Down’ was permitted for 6 months during which time productivity fell noticeably. Once the ‘Uniform’ was re-instated, productivity rose to its previous higher level.
Instead of fighting with clashing fashion statements or Rupert Bearing..Yuk! Let’s all get on with the business at hand and work our way up and out of this recession.
By Mr DKJ on May 27, 2009 | Reply
Great article but I think we need to take from it that the current cloning of dress sense needs to stop rather than trying to imprint more rigidity only to suit one persone preference.
People should dress with more abandon in my opinion without fear of snooty stuffy fashion police with the only restraint being that it should look smart.
Lets not get all jelous and nasty if a young lady wishes to wear short trousers, nore pompous if men don’t wear a tie or indeed chose an OB instead of a PINKS tie for a meeting.
Lets make property more stylish and attractive, it could do with a boost
By El Zorro on Jul 31, 2009 | Reply
2 words: flip flops!
the worst office crime. although mountain trainers are quite offensive too.
Z